SARS-CoV-2 infection and antibody seroprevalence in routine surveillance patients, healthcare workers and general population in Kita region, Mali: an observational study 2020-2021.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the degree of SARS-CoV-2 transmission among healthcare workers (HCWs) and general population in Kita region of Mali. DESIGN: Routine surveillance in 12 health facilities, HCWs serosurvey in five health facilities and community serosurvey in 16 villages in or near Kita town, Mali. SETTING: Kita region, western Mali; local health centres around the central (regional) referral health centre. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in routine surveillance, HCWs in local health centres and community members of all ages in populations associated with study health centres. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Seropositivity of ELISA test detecting SARS-CoV-2-specific total antibodies and real-time RT-PCR confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection. RESULTS: From 2392 routine surveillance samples, 68 (2.8%, 95% CI: 2.2% to 3.6%) tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR. The monthly positivity rate was 0% in June-August 2020 and gradually increased to 6% by December 2020 and 6.2% by January 2021, then declined to 5.5%, 3.3%, 3.6% and 0.8% in February, March, April and May 2021, respectively. From 397 serum samples collected from 113 HCWs, 175 (44.1%, 95% CI: 39.1% to 49.1%) were positive for SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. The monthly seroprevalence was around 10% from September to November 2020 and increased to over 40% from December 2020 to May 2021. For community serosurvey in December 2020, overall seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 27.7%. The highest age-stratified seroprevalence was observed in participants aged 60-69 years (45.5%, 95% CI: 32.3% to 58.6%). The lowest was in children aged 0-9 years (14.0%, 95% CI: 7.4% to 20.6%). CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 in rural Mali is much more widespread than assumed by national testing data and particularly in the older population and frontline HCWs. The observation is contrary to the widely expressed view, based on limited data, that COVID-19 infection rates were lower in 2020-2021 in West Africa than in other settings.

A fast extraction-free isothermal LAMP assay for detection of SARS-CoV-2 with potential use in resource-limited settings.

BACKGROUND: To retain the spread of SARS-CoV-2, fast, sensitive and cost-effective testing is essential, particularly in resource limited settings (RLS). Current standard nucleic acid-based RT-PCR assays, although highly sensitive and specific, require transportation of samples to specialised laboratories, trained staff and expensive reagents. The latter are often not readily available in low- and middle-income countries and this may significantly impact on the successful disease management in these settings. Various studies have suggested a SARS-CoV-2 loop mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) assay as an alternative method to RT-PCR. METHODS: Four previously published primer pairs were used for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in the LAMP assay. To determine optimal conditions, different temperatures, sample input and incubation times were tested. Ninety-three extracted RNA samples from St. George's Hospital, London, 10 non-extracted nasopharyngeal swab samples from Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, and 92 non-extracted samples from Queen Elisabeth Central Hospital (QECH), Malawi, which have previously been tested for SARS-Cov-2 by quantitative reverse-transcription RealTime PCR (qRT-PCR), were analysed in the LAMP assay. RESULTS: In this study we report the optimisation of an extraction-free colourimetric SARS-CoV-2 LAMP assay and demonstrated that a lower limit of detection (LOD) between 10 and 100 copies/µL of SARS-CoV-2 could be readily detected by a colour change of the reaction within as little as 30 min. We further show that this assay could be quickly established in Malawi, as no expensive equipment is necessary. We tested 92 clinical samples from QECH and showed the sensitivity and specificity of the assay to be 86.7% and 98.4%, respectively. Some viral transport media, used routinely to stabilise RNA in clinical samples during transportation, caused a non-specific colour-change in the LAMP reaction and therefore we suggest collecting samples in phosphate buffered saline (which did not affect the colour) as the assay allows immediate sample analysis on-site. CONCLUSION: SARS-CoV-2 LAMP is a cheap and reliable assay that can be readily employed in RLS to improve disease monitoring and management.

An investigation into the presence of pathogens on inanimate surfaces in the hospital environment

BackgroundThe hospital environment is understood to play an important role in the transmission of nosocomial pathogens, with inanimate surfaces facilitating pathogen movement and persistence in the environment. The majority of studies of surface contamination have been carried out in outbreak conditions or on high-dependency wards. Current surface cleaning guidance only requires surfaces to be visually clean. Microbiological standards for cleanliness have been proposed, however they are not widely adopted, and little implementation guidance is available. Evidence-based surface sampling protocols are required for the transmission risk surfaces pose to be adequately quantified and addressed.MethodsEnvironmental surface samples will be collected in a number of in- and outpatient settings, staff, and public areas, such as waiting rooms. This will be done before and after cleaning. Pathogens associated with nosocomial infection (e.g., ESKAPE pathogens, Clostridioides difficile and Candida auris) will be identified through culture methods and MALDI-ToF mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of isolates will be determined following EUCAST protocols. Real-time PCR will be utilized to identify viral pathogens (including norovirus, adenovirus, influenza and SARS-CoV-2) present. Following this, samples will be collected for community composition sequencing, allowing for non-culturable microorganisms to be identified. Whole genome sequencing will be performed on any pathogens of interest isolated during this investigation.Results and ConclusionFewer microorganisms are expected to be isolated after cleaning than prior, and samples from in-patient environments will have higher proportions of pathogens. The hospital microbiome has rarely been investigated outside of outbreak conditions. This study presents a novel, systematic approach to assess the microorganisms present in the hospital environment, and how they are impacted by current cleaning measures. This will build a comprehensive picture of the hospital microflora and provide an evidence base for the development of surface sampling protocols, helping inform clinical risk assessments and subsequently improving patient outcomes.